Recent Posts

Sunday, December 26, 2010

The Purpose of Trials

POSTING #8

"Then in life's goblet freely press The leaves that give it bitterness, Nor prize the colored waters less, For in thy darkness and distress New light and strength they give!
"And he who has not learned to know How false its sparkling bubbles show, How bitter are the drops of woe, With which its brim may overflow, He has not learned to live."  Longfellow


As imperfect mortals we are sometimes I wonder if we truly understand the purpose of trials?  It is easy to view something that is hard or uncomfortable as a negative experience; however, the irony is that trials actually have the capability of making us stronger, more well-rounded individuals.  Trials not only have the capability of improving our character but they help us encourage character development within those around us. Thus trials serve a two-fold purpose: to learn, and to teach.  First we must gain the confidence that trials we are personally given are for a purpose: to shape the individual.  Then we must extend that knowledge to those who have yet to see the value in their own trial; not by delivering them from their trial rather offering hope, that in the end, if they have lived and learned it well, it will become the greatest asset they have in building their character.

An example of this can be taken from the Bible.  The account of Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis has created speculation that mankind was cursed from birth; trials was because of Adam's default.  This is exemplified in the story of Adam and Eve being cast out of the Garden of Eden, showing God as an unmerciful being.  However, in verses 22-24 we read the following: 

And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever/Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken/So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”

This verse clarifies that God was extending mercy to Adam and Eve by having them leave the Garden.   If they had stayed in the Garden they would have essentially lived forever in a state of sin. Their purpose was to fall in order for them to fully learn how to build their characters and to become one with God someday; they were to leave the perfected state in which they lived and be tested in a state of trial.   

This example is more explicit in a scripture found in Deuteronomy.  In verses 9-10 the Lord states that this scripture is meant for all: “For the Lord’s portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance/ He found him in a desert land, and in the waste howling wilderness; he led him about, he instructed him, he kept him as the apple of his eye.”  The first application in this scripture: this is a universal story— it is applicable to the mistake(s) and trials of all mankind.  This account also gives greater meaning to God’s reasoning for trial through the metaphor of the eagle and her eaglets:

11 As an eagle stirreth up her nest, fluttereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings:
12 So the Lord alone did lead him, and there was no strange god with him.

As an eagle needs to push her eaglets out of the nest so they can learn to fly, God needs to test mankind so that hopefully, as they accept mortality and death, they will rely on him and his merits to ultimately save and redeem them.  With the help of these narratives, our implicit conception of travail can be made explicit to ourselves and communicated to others. 

In summary, I wanted to share a few more thoughts I had regarding the second purpose of trials. The mother bird who doesn’t fully let her young hit the ground in their failed attempt at flight, also sees the value of making her eaglets nest uncomfortable by stirring them and making them face their fear of flying.  She knows that in order for them to be successful they must learn how to take care of themselves, learn how to fly, learn how to find their own food, build their own nest, etc.  What does this teach us about the way we should raise our own children?  Are we coddling them too much?  Are we making life easy for them because we don’t want them to feel the discomfort of abandonment, suffering, fear, failure, disappointment, etc.?  Are we a disservice them, halting their very progression, by helping them too much?  Remember the Genesis account, the Lord will always succor us, he will always provide a way, but he will never take an experience away from us that he knows is necessary in order to reach our fullest potential.  I think both of these scriptural examples can be used to help us help ourselves and help those in close proximity to us.

To end, this is a story I was fortunate to read in college that serves as another beautiful example of coming to fully realize the importance of trials. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. I bolded some of my favorite parts applicable to this entry.




THE MOURNING-VEIL by Harriet Beecher Stowe
"Then in life's goblet freely press 
 The leaves that give it bitterness, 
 Nor prize the colored waters less, 
 For in thy darkness and distress
New light and strength they give!
"And he who has not learned to know 
 How false its sparkling bubbles show, 
 How bitter are the drops of woe, 
 With which its brim may overflow, 
 He has not learned to live.
Longfellow.
It was sunset. The day had been one of the sultriest of August. It would seem as if the fierce alembic of the last twenty-four hours had melted it like the pearl in the golden cup of Cleopatra, and it lay in the west a fused mass of transparent brightness. The reflection from the edges of a hundred clouds wandered hither and thither, over rock and tree and flower, giving a strange, unearthly brilliancy to the most familiar things.
A group of children had gathered about their mother in the summer-house of a garden which faced the sunset sky. The house was one of those square, stately, wooden structures, white, with green blinds, in which of old times the better classes of New England delighted, and which remain to us as memorials of a respectable past. It stood under the arches of two gigantic elms, and was flanked on either side with gardens and grounds which seemed designed on purpose for hospitality and family freedom. The evening light colored huge bouquets of petunias, which stood with their white or crimson faces looking westward, as if they were thinking creatures. It illumined name-colored verbenas, and tall columns of pink and snowy phloxes, and hedges of August roses, making them radiant as the flowers of a dream.
The group in the summer-house requires more particular attention. The father and mother, whom we shall call Albert and Olivia, were of the wealthiest class of the neighboring city, and had been induced by the facility of railroad traveling, and a sensible way of viewing things, to fixtheir permanent residence in the quiet little village of Q .
Albert had nothing in him different from multitudes of hearty, joyous, healthily constituted men, who subsist upon daily newspapers, and find the world a most comfortable place to live in. As to Olivia, she was in the warm noon of life, and a picture of vitality and enjoyment. A plump, firm cheek, a dark eye, a motherly fullness of form, spoke the being made to receive and enjoy the things of earth, the warm-hearted wife, the indulgent mother, the hospitable mistress of the mansion. It is true that the smile on the lip had something of earthly pride blended with womanly sweetness, — the pride of one who has as yet known only prosperity and success, to whom no mischance has yet shown the frail basis on which human hopes are built. Her foot had as yet trod only the high places of life, but she walked there with a natural grace and nobleness that made every one feel that she was made for them and they for her.
Around the parents were gathered at this moment a charming group of children, who with much merriment were proceeding to undo a bundle the father had just brought from the city.
"Here, Rose," said little Amy, a blue-eyed, flaxen-haired pet, who seemed to be a privileged character, " let me come; don't be all night with your orderly ways; let me cut that string." A sharp flash of the scissors, a quick report of the bursting string, and the package lay opened to the little marauder. Rose drew back, smiled, and gave an indulgent look at her eager younger sister and the two little ones who immediately gathered around. She was one of those calm, thoughtful, womanly young girls, that seem born for pattern elder sisters, and for the stay and support of mother's hearts. She watched with a gentle, quiet curiosity the quick and eager fingers that soon were busy in exposing the mysteries of the parcel.
"There's a dress for Rose," said Amy, triumphantly drawing out a delicate muslin; "I can always tell what's for her."
"How?" put in the father, who stood regarding the proceeding with that air of amused superiority with which the wearers of broadcloth look down on the mysteries of muslin and barege.
"How ?" said Amy, " why, because they look just like her. If I were to see that lilac muslin in China, I should say it was meant for Rose. Now this is mine, I know — this bright pink; is n't it, mamma? No half shades about me!"
"No, indeed," said her mother; "that is your greatest fault, Amy."
"Oh, well, mamma, Rose has enough for both; you must rub us together, as they do light red and Prussian blue, to make a neutral tint. But oh, what a ribbon! oh, mother, what a love of a ribbon! Rose! Rose! look at this ribbon! And oh, those buttons! Fred, I do believe they are for your new coat! Oh, and those studs, father, where did you get them? What's in that box? a bracelet for Rose, I know! oh, how beautiful! perfectly exquisite! And here — oh!"
Here something happened to check the volubility of the little speaker; for as she hastily, and with the license of a petted child, pulled the articles from the parcel, she was startled to find lying among the numerous colored things a black crape veil. Sombre, dark, and ill-omened enough it looked there, with pink, and lilac, and blue, and glittering bijouterie around it!
Amy dropped it with instinctive repugnance, and there was a general exclamation, "Mamma, what's this? how came it here? what did you get this for?"
"Strange!" said Olivia; "it is a mourning-veil. Of course I did not order it. How it came in here nobody knows; it must have been a mistake of the clerk."
"Certainly it is a mistake," said Amy; "we have nothing to do with mourning, have we?"
"No, to be sure; what should we mourn for?" chimed in little Fred and Mary.
"What a dark, ugly thing it is!" said Amy, unfolding and throwing it over her head; "how dismal it must be to see the world through such a veil as this!"
"And yet till one has seen the world through a veil like that, one has never truly lived," said another voice, joining in the conversation.
"Ah, Father Payson, are you there?" said two or three voices at once.
Father Payson was the minister of the village, and their nearest neighbor; and not only their nearest neighbor, but their nearest friend. In the afternoon of his years, life's day with him now stood at that hour when, though the shadows fall eastward, yet the colors are warmer, and the songs of the birds sweeter, than even in its jubilant morning.
God sometimes gives to good men a guileless and holy second childhood, in which the soul becomes childlike, not childish, and the faculties in full fruit and ripeness are mellow without sign of decay. This is that songful land of Beulah, where they who have traveled manfully the Christian way abide awhile to show the world a perfected manhood. Life, with its battles and its sorrows, lies far behind them; the soul has thrown off its armor, and sits in an evening undress of calm and holy leisure. Thrice blessed the family or neighborhood that numbers among it one of these not yet ascended saints! Gentle are they and tolerant, apt to play with little children, easy to be pleased with simple pleasures, and with a pitying wisdom guiding those who err. New England has been blessed in numbering many such among her country pastors; and a spontaneous, instinctive deference honors them with the title of Father.
Father Payson was the welcome inmate of every family in the village, the chosen friend even of the young and thoughtless. He had stories for children, jokes for the young, and wisdom for all. He "talked good," as the phrase goes, — not because he was the minister, but because, being good, he could not help it; yet his words, unconsciously to himself, were often parables, because life to him had become all spiritualized, and he saw sacred meanings under worldly things.
The children seized him lovingly by either hand and seated him in the arbor.
"Is n't it strange," said Amy, "to see this ugly black thing among all these bright colors? such a strange mistake in the clerk!"
"If one were inclined to be superstitious," said Albert, "he might call this an omen."
"What did you mean, sir," asked Rose, quietly seating herself at his feet, "by 'seeing life through this veil'?"
"It was a parable, my daughter," he said, laying his hand on her head.
"I never have had any deep sorrow," said Olivia musingly; "we have been favored ones hitherto. But why did you say one must see the world through such a medium as this?"
"Sorrow is God's school," said the old man. "Even God's own Son was not made perfect without it; though a son, yet learned he obedience by the things that he suffered. Many of the brightest virtues are like stars; there must be night or they cannot shine. Without suffering, there could be no fortitude, no patience, no compassion, no sympathy. Take all sorrow out of life, and you take away all richness and depth and tenderness. Sorrow is the furnace that melts selfish hearts together in love. Many are hard and inconsiderate, not because they lack capability of feeling, but because the vase that holds the sweet waters has never been broken."
"Is it, then, an imperfection and misfortune never to have suffered?" said Olivia.
Father Payson looked down. Rose was looking into his face. There was a bright, eager, yet subdued expression in her eyes that struck him; it had often struck him before in the village church. It was as if his words had awakened an internal angel, that looked fluttering out behind them. Rose had been from childhood one of those thoughtful, listening children with whom one seems to commune without words. We spend hours talking with them, and fancy they have said many things to us, which, on reflection, we find have been said only with their silent answering eyes. Those who talk much often reply to you less than those who silently and thoughtfully listen. And so it came to pass that, on account of this quietly absorbent nature, Rose had grown to her parents' hearts with a peculiar nearness. Eighteen summers had perfected her beauty. The miracle of the growth and perfection of a human body and soul never waxes old; parents marvel at it in every household as if a child had never grown before; and so Olivia and Albert looked on their fair Rose daily with a restful and trusting pride.
At this moment she laid her hand on Father Payson's knee, and said earnestly, "Ought we to pray for sorrow, then?"
"Oh, no, no, no!" interrupted Olivia, with an instinctive shudder, — such a shudder as a warm, earnest, prosperous heart always gives as the shadow of the grave falls across it, — " don't say yes!"
"I do not say we should pray for it," said Father Payson; "yet the Master says, 'Blessed are they that mourn,' not 'Blessed are they that prosper.' So heaven and earth differ in their judgments."
"Ah, me!" said Olivia; "I am afraid I have not courage to wish to be among the blessed."
"Well," said Albert, whom the gravity of the discussion somewhat disturbed, "let us not borrow trouble; time enough to think of it when it happens. Come, the dew is falling, let us go in. I want to show Father Payson some peaches that will tempt his Christian graces to envy. Come, Rose, gather up here."
Bose, in a few moments, gathered the parcel together, and quietly flitted before them into the house.
"Now," said Albert, "you 'll see that girl will have everything quietly tucked away in just the right place; not a word said. She is a born housewife; it's in her, as much as it is in a pointer to show game."
"Bose is my right hand," said Olivia; "I should be lost without her."
Whence comes it that, just on the verge of the great crises and afflictions of life, words are often spoken that, to afterview, seem to have had a prophetic meaning? So often do we hear people saying, "Ah, the very day before I heard of this or that, we were saying so and so!" It would seem sometimes as if the soul felt itself being drawn within the dark sphere of a coming evil, of which as yet nothing outward tells. Then the thoughts and conversation flow in an almost prophetic channel, which a coming future too well interprets.
The evening passed cheerfully with our friends, notwithstanding the grave conversation in the arbor. The mourning-veil was laid away in a drawer along with many of its brilliant companions, and with it the thoughts it had suggested; and the merry laugh ringing from the half-open parlor-door showed that Father Payson was no despiser of the command to rejoice with them that do rejoice. Rose played and sung, the children danced, and the mirth was prolonged till a late hour in the evening. Olivia and Albert were lingering in the parlor after the departure of the family, busy in shutting windows, setting back chairs, and attending to all the last duties of orderly householders. A sudden shriek startled them; such a shriek as, once heard, is never forgotten. With an answering cry of horror, they rushed up the stairs. The hall lamp had been extinguished, but the passage and staircase were red with a broad glare from the open door of the nursery. A moment more showed them the drapery of the bed in which their youngest child was sleeping all in flames; then they saw a light form tearing down the blazing curtains.
"Oh, Rose! Rose! take care, for God's sake ! your dress! you 'll kill yourself! oh, God help us!"
There were a few moments — awful moments of struggle — when none knew or remembered what they did; a moment more and Rose lay panting in her father's arms, enveloped in a thick blanket which be had thrown around her burning nightdress. The fire was extinguished, the babe lay unawakened, and only the dark flecks of tinder scattered over the bed, and the trampled mass on the floor, told what had been. But Rose had breathed the hot breath of the flame, deadly to human life, and no water could quench that inward fire.
A word serves to explain all. The child's nurse had carelessly set a lamp too near the curtains, and the night breeze had wafted them into the flame. The apartment of Rose opened into the nursery, and as she stood in her nightdress before her mirror, arranging her hair, she saw the flashing of the flame, and, in the one idea of saving her little sister, forgot every other. That act of self-forgetfulness was her last earthly act; a few short hours of patient suffering were all that remained to her. Peacefully as she had lived she died, looking tenderly on her parents out of her large blue eyes, and only intent to soothe their pain.
"Yes, I suffer," she said, "but only a short pain. We must all suffer something. My Father thinks a very little enough for me. I have had such a happy life, I might bear just a little pain at the last."
A little later her mind seemed to wander. "Mamma, mamma," she said hurriedly, "I put the things all away; the lilac muslin and the barege. Mamma, that veil, the mourning-veil, is in the drawer. Oh, mamma, that veil was for you; don't refuse it; our Father sends it, and he knows best. Perhaps you will see heaven through that veil."
It is appalling to think how near to the happiest and most prosperous scene of life stands the saddest despair. All homes are haunted with awful possibilities, for whose realization no array of threatening agents is required, — no lightning, or tempest, or battle; a peaceful household lamp, a gust of perfumed evening air, a false step in a moment of gayety, a draught taken by mistake, a match overlooked or mislaid, a moment's oversight in handling a deadly weapon, — and the whole scene of life is irretrievably changed! It was but a day after the scene in the arbor, and all was mourning in the so lately happy, hospitable house; everybody looked through tears. There were subdued breathings, a low murmur, as of many listeners, a voice of prayer, and the wail of a funeral hymn, — and then the heavy tread of bearers, as, beneath the black pall, she was carried over the threshold of her home, never to return.
And Olivia and Albert came forth behind their dead. The folds of the dark veil seemed a refuge for the mother's sorrow. But how did the flowers of home, the familiar elms,the distant smiling prospect look through its gloomy folds, — emblem of the shadow which had fallen between her heart and life? When she looked at the dark moving hearse, she wondered that the sun still shone, that birds could sing, and that even her own flowers could be so bright.
Ah, mother ! the world had been just as full of sorrow the day before; the air as full of "farewells to the dying and mournings for the dead ;" but thou knewest it not! Now the outer world comes to thee through the mourning veil!
But after the funeral comes life again, — hard, cold, inexorable life, knocking with business-like sound at the mourner's door, obtruding its commonplace pertinacity on the dull ear of sorrow. The world cannot wait for us; the world knows no leisure for tears; it moves onward, and drags along with its motion the weary and heavy-laden who would fain rest. Olivia would have buried herself in her sorrows. There are those who refuse to be comforted. The condolence of friends seems only a mockery; and truly, nothing so shows the emptiness and poverty of human nature as its efforts at condolence.
Father Payson, however, was a visitor who would not be denied; there was something of gentle authority in his white hairs that might not be resisted. Old, and long-schooled in sorrow, his heart many times broken in past years, he knew all the ways of mourning. His was no official commonplace about "afflictive dispensations." He came first with that tender and reverent silence with which the man acquainted with grief approaches the divine mysteries of sorrow; and from time to time he cast on the troubled waters words, dropped like seeds, not for present fruitfulness, but to germinate after the floods had subsided. He watched beside a soul in affliction as a mother waits on the crisis of a fever whose turning is to be for life or for death; for he well knew that great sorrows never leave us as they find us; that the broken spirit, ill set, grows callous and distorted ever after. He had wise patience with every stage of sorrow; he knew that at first the soul is blind, and deaf, and dumb. He was not alarmed when returning vitality showed itself only in moral spasms and convulsions; for in all great griefs come hours of conflict, when the soul is tempted, and complaining, murmuring, dark, skeptical thoughts are whirled like withered leaves through all its desolate chambers.
"What have I learned by looking through this veil?" said Olivia to him bitterly, one day when they were coming out of a house where they had been visiting a mourning family. "I was trusting in God as an indulgent Father; life seemed beautiful to me in the light of His goodness; now I see only His inflexible severity. I never knew before how much mourning and sorrow there had been even in this little village. There is scarcely a house where something dreadful has not at some time happened. How many families here have been called to mourning since we have I I have not taken up a paper in which I have not seen a record of two or three accidental deaths; some of them even more bitter and cruel than what has befallen us. I read this morning of a poor washerwoman, whose house was burned, and all her children consumed, while she was away working for her bread. I read the other day of a blind man whose only son was drowned in his very presence, while he could do nothing to help him. I was visiting yesterday that poor dressmaker whom you know. She has by toil and pains been educating a fine and dutiful son. He is smitten down with hopeless disease, while her idiot child, who can do nobody any good, is spared. Ah, this mourning-veil has indeed opened my eyes; but it has taught me to add all the sorrows of the world to my own ; and can I believe in God's love?"
"Daughter," said the old man, " I am not ignorant of these things. I have buried seven children; I have buried my wife; and God has laid on me in my time reproach, and controversy, and contempt. Each cross seemed, at the time, heavier than the others. Each in its day seemed to be what I least could bear; and I would have cried,' Anything but this!' And yet, now when I look back, I cannot see one of these sorrows that has not been made a joy to me. With every one some perversity or sin has been subdued, some chain unbound, some good purpose perfected. God has taken my loved ones, but he has given me love. He has given me the power of submission and of consolation; and I have blessed him many times in my ministry for all I have suffered, for by it I have stayed up many that were ready to perish."
"Ah," said Olivia, "you indeed have reason to be comforted, because you can see in yourself the fruit of your sorrows; but I am not improving; I am only crushed and darkened, — not amended."
"Have patience with thyself, child; weeping must endure for a night; all comes not at once. 'No trial for the present seemeth joyous;' but 'afterwards it yieldeth the peaceable fruit;' — have faith in this afterwards. Some one says that it is not in the tempest one walks the beach to look for the treasures of wrecked ships; but when the storm is past we find pearls and precious stones washed ashore. Are there not even now some of these in your path? Is not the love between you and your husband deeper and more intimate since this affliction? Do you not love your other children more tenderly? Did you not tell me that you had thought on the sorrows of every house in this village? Courage, my child! that is a good sign. Once, as you read the papers, you thought nothing of those who lost friends; now you notice and feel. Take the sorrows of others to your heart; they shall widen and deepen it. Ours is a religion of sorrow. The Captain of our salvation was made perfect through suffering; our Father is the God of all consolation; our Teacher is named the Comforter; and all other mysteries are swallowed up in the mystery of the Divine sorrow. 'In all our afflictions He is afflicted.' God refuseth not to suffer; — shall we?"
There is no grave so desolate that flowers will not at last spring on it. Time passed with Albert and Olivia with healing in its wings. The secret place of tears became first a temple of prayer, and afterwards of praise ; and the heavy cloud was remembered by the flowers that sprung up after the rain. The vacant chair in the household circle had grown to be a tender influence, not a harrowing one; and the virtues of the lost one seemed to sow themselves like the scattered seeds of a fallen flower, and to spring up in the hearts of the surviving ones. More tender and more blessed is often the brooding influence of the sacred dead than the words of the living.
Olivia became known in the abodes of sorrow, and a deep power seemed given her to console the suffering and distressed. A deeper power of love sprung up within her; and love, though born of sorrow, ever brings peace with it. Many were the hearts that reposed on her; many the wandering that she reclaimed, the wavering that she upheld, the desolate that she comforted. As a soul in heaven may look back on earth, and smile at its past sorrows, so, even here, it may rise to a sphere where it may look down on the storm that once threatened to overwhelm it.
It was on the afternoon of just such another summer day as we have described at the opening of our story, that Olivia was in her apartment, directing the folding and laying away of mourning-garments. She took up the dark veil and looked on it kindly, as on a faithful friend. How much had she seen and learned behind the refuge of its sheltering folds! She turned her thoughts within herself. She was calm once more, and happy, — happy with a wider and steadier basis than ever before. A new world seemed opened within her; and with a heart raised in thankfulness she placed the veil among her most sacred treasures.
Yes, there by the smiling image of the lost one, by the curls of her glossy hair, by the faded flowers taken from her bier, was laid in solemn thankfulness the MourningVeil.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Life Coach Videos

Mike shared these with me and I thought they were really funny and educational and wanted to share them.




Friday, December 17, 2010

Connie Podesta: Men Are Better At Getting Their Needs Met

Friday, September 10, 2010

Burning of the Quran

So I gave my two cents worth on facebook about this issue that floored me, but I wanted to elaborate on it by expressing more of my view point and opinion because nothing bothers me more than ideologies that breed discrimination. 

On facebook I wrote the following:

I for one would like to be a Christian voice advocating against the heinous act this so called Christian preacher plans to execute on 9/11—on burning copies of the Quran. It disgusts me when people use religion as a means to advance their own agenda. Did we not learn anything from the martyrs of the 16th century—those who died to protect the burning of the Bible? This is unbecoming of not only a Christian, but also a human being.

To continue with my opinion on the matter: I was so proud of the CNN reporter who adamantly stood up against this man and presented some pressing concerns on the matter regarding the kind of consequences that might surface from his actions?  For example, one of the main concerns she addressed was the safety of our military serving in Afghanistan and other areas around the world.  She asked the question, would you like innocent blood to be on your hands for the violent outbreaks of animosity that will be imposed upon those serving our country overseas?

Another consequence: creating further animosity not only with nations outside our border but citizens within our own country; i.e. radical Muslims acting in retaliation of America’s hypocrisy in the constitutional right of every American citizen (yes, even Muslims are considered citizens of America) to exercise freedom of religion.   

How can burning someone’s sacred text bridge the gap of hatred that divides us from even being civil with one another?  How can fighting hate with hate accomplish anything?  As the reporter stated, to appose this mans antics of using the Bible as a way to rationalize his actions (the example he used was Christ turning over the money changers table at the temple): I thought it was a common Christian belief to turn the other cheek, to take the high road?  I don’t know what copy of the Bible this man preaches his sermons from but I am pretty sure Christ clarified how we are supposed to treat our “enemies” as noted in his sermon on the mount found in Matthew 5:

38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An aeye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not aevil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right bcheek, cturn to him the other also.
43 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt alove thy bneighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, aLove your benemies, cbless them that dcurse you, do egood to them that fhate you, and gpray for them which despitefully use you, and hpersecute you;

I think verse 19 sums up Christ’s view on those who teach otherwise:

Whosoever therefore shall abreak one of these least commandments, band shall cteach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and dteach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven”

That is the goal right—for us all to be great, for us all to be better people by leading our lives with good intentions. 

My bit of advise to the preacher who chose to use scriptures to advance his own political agenda is this: you might want to brush up on the theology of the New Testament—aka the “new law”— Christ enacted during his ministry on earth, and incorporate them into your antics.    If you want to continue to use only parts of the Bible that add value to your agenda and leave the others by the wayside, you might want to remember that no matter how you slant a biblical passage, the only judge of any mans character is God:  the perfect judge. We have no right as the imperfect mortals we are to pass judgment on someone else no matter the judgment or animosity they have passed upon us.   

Imagine if our bible was in jeopardy once again, as was previously noted in the 16th century during the onset of the Reformation and the cruel reign of Mary I, of England, aka “Bloody Mary”.  What if Muslims decided to “pay us back” for the harm we have done them by burning our holy text either here in our own country or in their own land?

You better believe the citizens of this country would rise up in protest and defense; we would not stand for it. This is a country formed to liberate people from inhumane acts of brutality imposed upon them by “radical leaders” who seek to suppress the equal rights of ALL people. 

The preacher and his followers might say in contest to my opinion: “that is exactly what we was doing, enacting our freedom of speech . . . “ RUBISH!  The reality of freedom of speech, or any other freedom we enjoy as citizens of this country is that when it starts infringing upon others freedom (i.e. when you deliberately take away another persons freedom of speech—the copies of the Quran being able to exist freely in this country is the example) your freedom of speech becomes null and void. 

In summary, although it may not sound like it, I honestly feel sorry for the chap.  He supposedly came up with this idea to show the radicals of the Muslim faith that we do not tolerate their behavior; a “we’ll show you” gesture that was nothing less than an expression of ignorance and intolerance.  And so I pray that he will have tolerance and I pray that ignorance will be replaced by knowledge of what it truly means to strive to be a Christian.  

Monday, August 16, 2010

Thought of the Month

Funny yet enlightening: at what age did cellulite turn from being cute to unfavorable? Think about it, as a baby our dimpled skin was something to be proud of; people would smile and shower us with compliments.  Now we are scrutinized for actually growing into our skin, and obsess about it's dwelling places rather than celebrate the beauty of its existence.  My motto is "if it is something you can't control, let it go!"  This epiphany has caused me to spread the word that I declare today—August 16— as National Cellulite Day.  A  day when every woman (and man) can look in the mirror and be proud of the dimpled cheeks and thighs staring back at them. . . Let's change the worlds perception of cellulite one butt at a time!     

Friday, May 28, 2010

Knowledge

"I have gone about separating fact from fiction, faith from fantasy, and essentials from non-essentials. And I must encourage students to learn all they can about the subjects of their interest, not being fearful of whatever truth they find." 


My adorable cousin Sharisse sent this article to me in response to this semi-battle I think most LDS students face in an academic setting—secular knowledge vs. religious belief.  Can the two co-exist?  Do they always have to create controversial conversations that lead to heated debates?  Does the act of expanding our minds open us up to the possibility of dislocating our faith? 

I would answer no to all of these questions.  As a 90-year old graduate at the University of Washington recently stated to those continuing their education: “get all the education you can”, I too believe that education makes us better human beings, or at least has the capability to do so if we allow it.  I think one of the problems that LDS students face is the fear of “worldly” knowledge shaking their faith.  And yet the Lord asks of us in D&C 88:118-119: “And as all have not afaith, seek ye diligently and bteach one another words of cwisdom; yea, seek ye out of the best dbooks words of wisdom; seek learning, even by study and also by faith. aOrganize yourselves; prepare every needful thing; and establish a bhouse, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God”. 

As this professor eloquently stated, just because someone makes a claim about something “factual” does not mean truth is automatically asserted.  Truth, as my English professor once said to our class in departing BYU, is something you need to push, something you need to continue to search for by asking hard questions, by seeking to understand and by continuing to be a student of learning the rest of your life.  Going back to my previous statement about education making us better members of humanity, I think education can not only bring us out of ignorance but it has the ability to teach us compassion, to give us understanding, and to help us respect those outside of our “community;” those who may not share our religious beliefs but STILL have an equal footing in the eyes of the Lord, for as Peter once said: Of a truth I perceive that God is no arespecter of persons” (Acts 10:34).

Thank you for sharing this with me; I think it was beautifully stated in a way that makes all of us who unnecessarily fear knowledge, exhale a sigh of relief! J

(I bolded parts I personally thought were most insightful).

 (Excerpts from) RUGS AND PILLARS:
How I View Myself as a Teacher at an LDS University.
(Prepared for Sunstone TheologicalSymposium
Panel on "Pillars of My Faith," August 21, 1986)
James B. Allen

If anyone can go from Heaven to Hell and back again in two minutes or less, I did it one day in the mid-1960s during a surprising conversation with a student. That conversation so affected me in its implications that I have never forgotten it. "Brother Allen," I can still hear her say, "I want you to know that in your Church History class you pulled the rug right out from under my testimony--but you replaced it with pillars that can never be shaken!" At first I was stunned, and for a moment my mind could not get past the first half of her statement. What had I done or said? How could I possibly have "pulled the rug" from under anyone's faith in the Church I had worked so hard all my life to support, sustain, and bear witness of?

I dimly heard myself asking the student what she meant, but as she began to answer I still worried. Did the "rug pulling" take place all at once and, for a time, leave a void of doubt? Or, had the pulling out and replacement process proceeded somewhat smoothly and simultaneously? I desperately hoped so, as my mind gradually tuned in again to what my student was saying.

I'm not sure she had the "rug" very well defined in her mind, but I sensed that it consisted of at least two things: a lack of knowledge, and a tendency to place more faith in individuals than in what we in the Church call the testimony of the spirit. The "pillars," on the other hand, were certain intellectual and spiritual tools that I hoped I could help all my students acquire and learn how to use.

Most of these tools were attitudinal in nature. One, for example, was simply the love of knowledge--the thirst for information and understanding that comes as one begins to live the life of the mind and feel the profound pleasure of having a whole new world open up through the process of thoughtful reading and inquiry--especially in the field of history. Another tool, however, was the realization that knowledge of historical facts is not necessarily synonymous with knowledge of "truth." Contrary to popular myth, facts seldom, if ever, speak for themselves. Rather, historians and other scholars constantly sort, analyze, and interpret facts, both old and newly discovered, in an effort to get closer to historical "truth," and my student had begun to understand that all history, including Church history, is interpretive in nature and that no historian's interpretation of the facts is beyond challenge.

Another of her new tools was a mature awareness that people will be disappointed if they expect perfection, even among the Saints of God, and that one's faith in the Church should not be built upon the "arm of flesh," or the assumption that any person, even a prophet, is above human imperfections. The many times Joseph Smith was called into account for his own mistakes soon convinced my student of that. More recently, Elder Neal A. Maxwell commented on the attitude of world-famous LDS scientist Henry Eyring: "Though much of his life was spent in the midst of the ordered world of molecules, practical Henry nevertheless reminded us that, while God and His world are perfect, we are wise to make allowances in our faith for the imperfections in each other."1

A fourth pillar for my young student's slowly maturing faith was an increasing confidence in her own ability to use the power of reason in separating truth from folly and in discovering for herself patterns and principles that would help her make sense from her growing world of both religious and secular knowledge. As a hymnist once wrote:

Freedom and reason make us men;
Take these away, what are we then?
Mere animals, and just as well
The beasts may think of heaven or hell.2

Too often, my student had discovered, people appear to want their faith handed to them by others--they seem afraid to use that wonderful, God-given power of reason that separates humans from animals and is fundamental to our belief that individual salvation is really dependent upon how effectively one exercises his or her free agency. I sometimes remind students of what Elder J. Golden Kimball once said in general conference:

Some people fancy that because we have the Presidency and Apostles of the Church they will do the thinking for us. There are men and women so mentally lazy that they hardly think for themselves. To think calls for effort, which makes some men tired and wearies their souls. . . . Latter-day Saints, you must think for yourselves. No man or woman can remain in this Church on borrowed light."3

Closely connected with this was another pillar: the ability to realize that we will never, at least in this life, have all the answers either to the mysteries of the universe or the mysteries of godliness. If one's faith is based on the assumption that the gospel automatically answers all our questions, then, indeed, it is based on a rug that will slip and slide with every new vibration. My student was beginning to learn the truth of what Brigham Young said as long ago as 1855:

I am so far from believing that any government upon this earth has constitutions and laws that are perfect, that I do not even believe that there is a single revelation, among the many God has given to the Church, that is perfect in its fulness. The revelations of God contain correct doctrine and principles, as far as they go; but it is impossible for the poor, weak, low, grovelling, sinful inhabitants of the earth to receive a revelation from the Almighty in all its perfections. He has to speak to us in a manner to meet the extent of our capacities. . . .

The laws the Lord has given us are not fully perfect, because the people could not receive them in their perfect fulness; but they can receive a little here and a little there, a little to-day and a little tomorrow, and a little more in advance of that next year, if they make a wise improvement upon every little that they receive.4

In the world of secular knowledge, some degree of uncertainty is considered necessary to the adventure of learning itself.5 I am not saying, of course, that our intellectual life should be one of total ambivalence--far from it. But we must learn to live with at least some ambivalence for that, it seems to me, only opens the door for the kind of continuing inquiry necessary to the discovery of truth as well as to the development and life of the mind. And, at least for me, it helps make life exciting. In our religious world there are many certainties, but there is much left to be discovered and revealed, and, I try to teach my LDS students, we should be excited with the possibility of helping to discover it.

I also try to teach my students that if, indeed, they succeed in their eager quest for new information, knowledge, ideas, and insights, they must also equip themselves with two more pillars that, at least in my mind, are essential to building an acceptable house of faith: humility in what one knows and charity toward those with whom one may disagree. "In essentials let there be unity; in non-essentials, liberty; and in all things, charity," Elder B. H. Roberts once emphasized during a general conference of the Church.6 How like the spirit of Joseph Smith, who said of Pelatiah Brown: "I did not like the old man being called up for erring in doctrine. It looks too much like the Methodists, and not like the Latter-day Saints. Methodists have creeds which a man must believe or be asked out of their church. I want the liberty of thinking and believing as I please. It feels so good not to be trammelled. It does not prove that a man is not a good man because he errs in doctrine."7

In addition to all that, I tried to teach the students in that girl's class that once they gain enough knowledge to make authoritative statements about some topics, they should never let anyone, including themselves, assume that they can make equally authoritative statements about others. I remember hearing Henry Eyring mention an experience with Albert Einstein during World War II. The two of them had been working all morning in a physics lab, and when they went out to lunch they happened to pass one of the "victory gardens" that were planted everywhere during the war. Eyring observed a bean patch and innocently asked Einstein what kind of beans they were. "I don't know," replied the greatest scientist on earth, and in re-telling the story Henry Eyring simply remarked, "You see, Einstein didn't know beans!" The point, of course, is that I may know a lot about a few things, and I can make some fairly authoritative statements on them, but this gives me no right to dogmatize on matters about which I know little or nothing.

Certainly there are many areas where I don't know beans, and I hope my students realize that. "I don't know" is a better answer than giving information that a student may later find to be untrue. If I do know something, however, it is better not to hedge or hide it, even if it seems troublesome, once the student begins to probe. At the same time, I should explain how I have gone about separating fact from fiction, faith from fantasy, and essentials from non-essentials. And I must encourage students to learn all they can about the subjects of their interest, not being fearful of whatever truth they find. I should also teach them about the possibilities of misleading through historical interpretation. Hopefully, all this will help them see reason for sometimes suspending judgement--for not jumping to conclusions whenever a new piece of information pops to the surface of their intellectual milieu.

If students respect me as a scholar, and are convinced I am not trying to hide anything from them, then they will also respect my integrity as a person. This means that when I tell them of my faith they must respect that, too. Hopefully, they also know that the fundamentals I believe in include, but are not limited to, the reality of God, the atonement and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the literal reality of Joseph Smith's visions, the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, the restoration of the gospel of Christ through Joseph Smith, and the importance and validity of temple work. These and other doctrinal things are as real to me as anything I may have learned in the secular world, and I try to share with my students the fact that I can no more ignore such realities in my ongoing search for truth than I can ignore the physical artifacts that may be discovered through traditional scholarly investigation.

Finally, and most important, the young lady who talked with me that day was beginning more fully to realize that while all these attitudes were important to a mature faith, even more important was the testimony of the spirit. "If you want to know whether Joseph Smith's testimony is true," I often say to students, "then you must have the same experience he had--and you can." They know, of course, I am not implying that they will see visions or heavenly beings. Rather, I am telling them that the truth of the essential foundations of the faith can be known to them only by the same process Joseph Smith went through. "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God," Joseph Smith read as a young man, and when he acted on that challenge, "in faith, nothing wavering," he received his answer. All the intellectual and attitudinal pillars were clearly essential, but this one was central to the structure of the house of faith I was trying to help my students build.

Before coming to this university I had spent several years teaching in the seminary and institute program of the Church. I knew well the intellectual problems often confronted by college students as the world of secular learning literally opened the skies with torrents of new ideas and information. Frequently their newly sharpened intellectual skills led them to see things they had never seen before, and find implications they had never found before, in both the history and the teachings of the Church. At times they also discovered new information about the past that seemed to fly in the face of something they had been taught as youngsters: some weakness or mistake, some heretofore unknown conflict, a change in some Church practice, or a modification in some Church teaching. Some who came with troubled questions seemed to want me to tell them that such bothersome things simply hadn't happened. Instead, I tried to help them understand how both the human and the divine could operate within the Church, and why they should not be surprised to see evidence of both in their study of Church history. I also tried to give them the tools by which they could separate essentials from non-essentials, and some deeper insight into how to gain the testimony of the spirit. No longer, I told them, could they rely on someone else's testimony--it was "do it yourself time."

One example was related to Joseph Smith's first vision. During Joseph Smith's lifetime he actually presented various differing accounts of the vision, and in the late 1960s I was invited to write about this in the pages of the Improvement Era. I was a bit dismayed that some people found it bothersome to their faith to learn that there might be some differences between the accounts. To me, it was only natural to assume that the prophet might emphasize different points as he talked to different people, or had different purposes, at different times. My training as a historian made that seem self-evident. I expected to find differences, but none that would negate the authenticity of the official account the prophet prepared for publication in 1838. Students, however, were asking about it, and I saw my article not only as a chance to say something in print that I believed deeply, but also as a tool that might help students as they wrestled with this kind of new information. "We believe," I wrote, "that Joseph Smith was telling the truth each time he related his experiences," and then I attempted to weave the various accounts into a composite analysis of this sacred experience in order to show their combined value and consistency. "We believe," of course, was an editorial expression, which really meant "I believe." And I could say that honestly because I had studied all of the accounts, and I had received my own confirming testimony of the integrity of Joseph Smith. There were, and still are, a lot of things about the Church that I did not know and did not understand, but on this I was sure, and I could say what I had to say to friends, students, and scholarly colleagues alike, whether they were in or out of the Church. "In the final analysis," I concluded, "the First Vision becomes truly meaningful in a personal way only when one seeks, as Joseph Smith sought, to reach God through private, earnest supplication."8

A few years later I had occasion to publish a different kind of article, that even more directly grew out of the needs of many of my students. In this case I deliberately used a historical event to help students work through their own contemporary problems related to the Church. I had been studying the debates in Utah, in 1919, over whether or not the United States should join the League of Nations. At the same time, I seemed to be inundated by students who were concerned with certain intense political controversies within the Church, and particularly with the fact that even some Church leaders seemed to disagree on political matters. Some of these students seemed to assume that there should be some final, authoritative, Church position even on the political issues of the day. Perhaps ironically, I had discovered that back in 1919 there were not only differences among Church leaders on the League of Nations, but that they did not hesitate to make their differences known. Even the President of the Church, Heber J. Grant, made a public statement supporting the League, but in doing so he made it clear that this was nothing more than a personal opinion, and he would never use the authority of the scriptures, or his position in the Church, to impose that view on others. In short, it seemed to me, what happened in 1919 wonderfully demonstrated the fact that one's testimony of the gospel should never compel a person to take particular political positions. What a golden opportunity, I thought, to use the events of the past to help students wrestle with their own problems of the present. Here was a way to build a pillar. So I wrote a speech, presented it before the Mormon History Association, and was able to get it published where it could become readily available to students and colleagues alike. I didn't mention contemporary political problems, but discussed in detail what had happened in 1919 and tried to draw important inferences from it. Differences of opinion are to be expected, I tried to show, but the important thing is to avoid bitterness in debate and accusations of lack of faith--something that had occurred, unfortunately, among certain unthinking members of the Church, and something that President Grant decried. As he talked to the Church about the controversy, in fact, he quoted something that President John Taylor had said to him when he was a young apostle:

My boy, never forget that when you are in the line of your duty your heart will be full of love and forgiveness. . . . You can know the difference between the Spirit of the Lord and the spirit of the adversary, when you find that you are happy and contended, that you love your fellows, that you are anxious for their welfare; and you can tell that you do not have that spirit when you are full of animosity and feel that you would like to mow somebody down.

"And so the Church went on," I began my concluding paragraph, and what followed was really my personal message to my students:

Perhaps at no time in its history had there been such divergence of opinion among its leaders, but it seemed to have little effect upon their working together in harmony to build the Kingdom. Does this answer the question as to whether they should have been unified? Perhaps not, but at least it demonstrates that, in this instance, those who really wanted to follow the example of their leaders would not avoid debate or the expression of personal opinion, but would refuse to let that opinion stand in the way of good will based on genuine respect for the right and responsibility of each man to think and speak for himself on such issues. In this case there is a moral in history.9

Frequently I think back on that early, unsettling conversation about rugs and pillars, and on my determination to set the example for students in the integrity of both my scholarship and my faith. I'm sure I have not had a perfect record, but my blessing is that I can continue to try, then try some more, then try and try again. For some reason, I keep finding rugs that need replacing, and I sincerely pray that my ongoing efforts to exercise both responsible scholarship and abiding faith will continue to provide some pillars with which to do it.

1 .Kermit Eby, "Education for Sectarians." This address was distributed to
Seminary and Institute teachers sometime in the late 1950s, with the compliments of Ernest L. Wilkinson, Administrator, Board of Education. A copy is still in my possession. Eby was identified as Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.
2. Neal A. Maxwell, "In Memoriam: Henry Eyring, 1901-1981," Brigham Young University Studies 22 (Winter 1982): 3.
3. "Know This, that Every Soul is Free," by William C. Clegg, in Hymns of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, No. 90. In that spirit, Lowell Bennion also reminds us that “In man’s search for truth the mind palys a leading and continuous role.” Lowell L. Bennion, Religion and the Pursuit of Truth (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1959), 29.
4. Conference Report, April, 1904, p. 28.
5. Journal of Discourses 2:314. Address delivered in the tabernacle by President Brigham Young, July 8, 1855.
6. "For myself," wrote a prominent scientist, "I like a universe that includes much that is unknown and, at the same time, much that is knowable. A universe in which everything is known would be static and dull, as boring as the heaven of some weak-minded theologians." Carl Sagan, Broca's Brain. Reflections on the Romance of Science (New York: Random House, 1974), p. 18.
7. Conference Report, October, 1912, p. 31.
8. Joseph Smith, History of the Church, ed., BH Roberts (Salt Lake City: Deseret News: 1949) 5:340.
9. Proverbs 4:7.
10. .James B. Allen, "Eight Contemporary Accounts of Joseph Smith's First Vision--What Do We Learn From Them?" The Improvement Era, April, 1970, pp. 4-13.
11. See James B. Allen, "Personal Faith and Public Policy: Some Timely Observations on the League of Nations Controversy in Utah," Brigham Young University Studies 14 (Autumn, 1973): 77-98.